The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6774•United States of America v. Havies Junior Thompson, a/k/a Man, a/k/a Sld Dft 3:01CR184- 3, a/k/a Manhova
09-6774Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 15, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6774
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
HAVIES JUNIOR THOMPSON, a/k/a Man, a/k/a Sld Dft 3:01CR184-
3, a/k/a Manhova,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen,
Senior District Judge. (3:01-cr-00184-GCM-3)
Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 15, 2009
Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mark Patrick Foster, Jr., LAW OFFICES OF MARK FOSTER, PC,
Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray,
Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina,
Edward R. Ryan, Acting United States Attorney, Charlotte, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Havies Junior Thompson appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence
filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We find no
reversible error and we thus affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. United States v. Thompson, No. 3:01-cr-
00184-GCM-3 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 6, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.