The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6739•Leon Coleman, a/k/a Mr. v. Maryland Parole Commission
09-6739Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 3, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6739
LEON COLEMAN, a/k/a Mr.,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION; COMMISSIONER C. BEIKERT; T.
HOWELL, #23; COMMISSIONER PATTERSON; ALL PAROLE AGENTS,
PAROLE ASSOCIATES, NAMES UNKNOWN,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District
Judge. (1:09-cv-00749-BEL)
Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 3, 2009
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leon Coleman, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Leon Coleman appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Coleman v. Maryland Parole Comm’n,
No. 1:09-cv-00749-BEL (D. Md. April 9, 2009). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.