The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6721•United States of America v. Matthew Dwayne Smith, a/k/a Mackie, a/k/a Smac
09-6721Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 25, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6721
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MATTHEW DWAYNE SMITH, a/k/a Mackie, a/k/a Smac,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey,
Chief District Judge. (3:05-cr-00007-JPB-JES-1)
Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 25, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Matthew Dwayne Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti,
Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorneys,
Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Matthew Dwayne Smith appeals the district court’s
order granting in part and denying in part his motion for
reduction of sentence filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)
(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Smith, No. 3:05-cr-00007-JPB-
JES-1 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 1, 2009). We deny as moot Smith’s motion
to place his case in abeyance pending rulings by the Supreme
Court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.