The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6714•Gary L. Wise v. HENRY F. FLOYD, Judge; CAMERON MCGOWAN CURRIE, Judge; WILLIAM M. CATOE, JR., Judge
09-6714Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 27, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6714
GARY L. WISE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
HENRY F. FLOYD, Judge; CAMERON MCGOWAN CURRIE, Judge;
WILLIAM M. CATOE, JR., Judge,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (8:09-cv-00454-HMH)
Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 27, 2009
Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary L. Wise, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gary L. Wise appeals the district court's order
adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his
claims against Defendants after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2006)
review. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Wise
v. Floyd, 8:09-cv-00454-HMH (D.S.C. Mar. 25, 2009). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.