United States of America v. David Wright

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6659
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVID WRIGHT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (6:05-cr-01163-HMH)
Submitted: January 11, 2010 Decided: January 25, 2010
Before MICHAEL, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Leesa Washington, Assistant
United States Attorney, Isaac Louis Johnson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
David Wright appeals the district court’s oral order
denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction
in sentence. As noted on the district court’s docket sheet, the
court denied relief on Wright’s motion for the reasons stated in
its July 11, 2008 order. The July 11 order reveals that Wright
was not eligible for a sentence reduction under Amendment 706
because he was held accountable for more than 4.5 kilograms of
crack. Because our review of the record reveals no reversible
error, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --