The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6654•United States of America v. Derwin Coles, a/k/a Woods
09-6654Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 5, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6654
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DERWIN COLES, a/k/a Woods,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver,
Jr., District Judge. (2:01-cr-00254-3)
Submitted: April 15, 2011 Decided: August 5, 2011
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Derwin Coles, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail, Assistant United
States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Derwin Coles appeals the district court’s order
granting in part and denying in part his motion filed pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Coles,
No. 2:01-cr-00254-3 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 19, 2009). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.