The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6598•Wanda Scott, a/k/a Wanda Ranae Scott Thomas v. State of South Carolina
09-6598Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 14, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6598
WANDA SCOTT, a/k/a Wanda Ranae Scott Thomas,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. William M. Catoe, Jr.,
Magistrate Judge. (6:08-cv-01684-GRA)
Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 14, 2009
Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wanda Scott, Appellant Pro Se. James Anthony Mabry, Assistant
Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Wanda Scott appeals the district court’s order denying
her motion for waiver of PACER fees. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Scott v. South
Carolina, No. 6:08-cv-01684-GRA (D.S.C. Mar. 18, 2009). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.