The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6508•United States of America v. Collins Kusi Sakyi
09-6508Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 1, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6508
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
COLLINS KUSI SAKYI,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:97-cr-00181-WCS-2)
Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: June 1, 2009
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Collins Kusi Sakyi, Appellant Pro Se. Dana James Boente, Acting
United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Collins Kusi Sakyi appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to file a late 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2006)
motion, his petition for writ of error corum nobis, and his
request for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Sakyi’s
request for court appointed counsel and affirm the district
court’s order for the reasons stated by the district court.
United States v. Sakyi, No. 1:97-cr-00181-WCS-2 (E.D. Va. filed
Jan. 13, 2009; entered Jan. 14, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.