Lord Versatile, a/k/a Venson Coward v. E.E. WRIGHT, JR., Chief Warden

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6505
LORD VERSATILE, a/k/a Venson Coward,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
E.E. WRIGHT, JR., Chief Warden,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
RUFUS FLEMING, Eastern Regional Director; J.K. VAUGHAN,
Inmate Hearing Officer; TRACY S. RAY, Chief Warden; RONALD
T. COKER, Department of Corrections Liaison,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (3:05-cv-00768-RLW)
Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 26, 2009
Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lord Versatile, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Larry Fitzgerald,
James R. Morgan, Jr., Robert T. Numbers, II, WOMBLE, CARLYLE,
SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, William

-- 1 of 3 --

Michael Holm, WILLIAMS MULLEN, McLean, Virginia, James Bennett
Kinsel, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, PLLC, Tysons Corner,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Lord Versatile appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Versatile v. Wright, No. 3:05-cv-00768-RLW (E.D. Va.
Feb. 23, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --