The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6434•United States of America v. Thomas B. Foster
09-6434Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 5, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6434
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
THOMAS B. FOSTER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen,
Senior District Judge. (3:96-cr-00005-GCM-DCK)
Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 5, 2009
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas B. Foster, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray,
Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Thomas B. Foster appeals the district court’s order
denying his § 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction
of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Therefore we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Foster, No. 3:96-cr-00005-GCM-
DCK (W.D.N.C. Feb. 24, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.