The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6423•Julian Edward Rochester v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
09-6423Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 5, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6423
JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; T. TRAVIS MEDLOCK,
Attorney General of the State of South Carolina,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (3:93-cv-02670-WBT)
Submitted: April 21, 2009 Decided: May 5, 2009
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Julian Edward Rochester, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka,
Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Julian Edward Rochester appeals the district court’s
order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. Because
Rochester failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of
a constitutional right, we deny a certificate of appealability
and dismiss the appeal. Rochester v. South Carolina Dept. of
Corrections, No. 3:93-cv-02670-WBT (D.S.C. Feb. 23, 2009). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.