The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6417•Edward Lee Birchett v. GARY WILLIAMS, Clerk, Sussex Circuit Court
09-6417Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 14, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6417
EDWARD LEE BIRCHETT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GARY WILLIAMS, Clerk, Sussex Circuit Court,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:08-cv-00762-REP)
Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 14, 2009
Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edward Lee Birchett, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Edward Lee Birchett appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without
prejudice for failure to complete a consent to the collection of
fees form as ordered by the magistrate judge. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Birchett v.
Williams, No. 3:08-cv-00762-REP (E.D. Va. Feb. 19, 2009). We
deny Birchett’s motions for appointment of counsel and motion
for a transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.