The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6396•Edgar Searcy v. PATRICIA STANSBERRY, Warden, F.C.C. Petersburg, Virginia
09-6396Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 5, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6396
EDGAR SEARCY,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
PATRICIA STANSBERRY, Warden, F.C.C. Petersburg, Virginia,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:08-cv-00050-REP)
Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 5, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Edgar Searcy, Appellant Pro Se. Robert P. McIntosh, Assistant
United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Edgar Searcy, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s order denying relief without prejudice on his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Searcy v. Stansberry, No. 3:08-cv-00050-
REP (E.D. Va. Feb. 19, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.