The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6340•United States of America v. Vernon Bryant, a/k/a Raymond Jackson, a/k/a Cully, a/k/a Samual Barry
09-6340Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 11, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6340
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
VERNON BRYANT, a/k/a Raymond Jackson, a/k/a Cully, a/k/a
Samual Barry,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:97-cr-00352-REP-1)
Submitted: April 20, 2009 Decided: May 11, 2009
Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vernon Bryant, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller,
Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Vernon Bryant appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence, 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Bryant, No.
3:97-cr-00352-REP-1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 15, 2008). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.