The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6339•Ivander James, Jr. v. PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Petersburg FCC Low
09-6339Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 1, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6339
IVANDER JAMES, JR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Petersburg FCC Low,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (3:08-cv-00512-RLW)
Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 1, 2009
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ivander James, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert P. McIntosh,
Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ivander James, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. James v. Stansberry, Case No. 3:08-cv-
00512-RLW (E.D. Va. Feb. 9, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.