The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6295•United States of America v. Ricky Lee Pierce
09-6295Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 16, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6295
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RICKY LEE PIERCE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (4:05-cr-00002-H-1)
Submitted: October 27, 2009 Decided: November 16, 2009
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ricky Lee Pierce, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf
A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Robert Jack
Higdon, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ricky Lee Pierce appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Pierce, No. 4:05-cr-
00002-H-1 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 9, 2009). Pierce’s motions for
appointment of counsel and to hold his informal brief in
abeyance are denied. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.