The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6261•Benjamin Ross Downey v. Gene Johnson; Helen F. Fahey; James Sisk
09-6261Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 1, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6261
BENJAMIN ROSS DOWNEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GENE JOHNSON; HELEN F. FAHEY; JAMES SISK,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District
Judge. (3:08-cv-00199-REP)
Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: June 1, 2009
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Benjamin Ross Downey, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Benjamin Ross Downey appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his civil rights action under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(g) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Downey v. Johnson, No. 3:08-cv-00199-REP
(E.D. Va. Jan. 21, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.