The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6243•Joseph M. Johnston v. KRISTIAN N. ALLEN, District Attorney
09-6243Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 30, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6243
JOSEPH M. JOHNSTON,
Petitioner – Appellant,
v.
KRISTIAN N. ALLEN, District Attorney,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Wallace W. Dixon,
Magistrate Judge. (1:09-cv-00046-UA-WWD)
Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: June 30, 2009
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph M. Johnston, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph M. Johnston appeals the district court’s order
denying his petition for writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave
to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the
reasons stated by the district court. Johnston v. Allen, No.
1:09-cv-00046-UA-WWD (M.D.N.C. Jan. 22, 2009). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.