The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6235•Ronald S. Snipe v. Wayne Phillips
09-6235Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 23, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6235
RONALD S. SNIPE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
WAYNE PHILLIPS,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey,
Chief District Judge. (3:08-cv-00022-JPB-JSK)
Submitted: February 18, 2010 Decided: February 23, 2010
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald S. Snipe, Appellant Pro Se. Helen Campbell Altmeyer,
Assistant United States Attorney, Daniel W. Dickinson, Jr.,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ronald S. Snipe, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order accepting in part and rejecting in part
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on
his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Snipe v. Phillips,
No. 3:08-cv-00022-JPB-JSK (N.D.W. Va. Dec. 23, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.