The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6188•Marcelino Rodriguez-Luna v. M. PETTIFORD, Warden
09-6188Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 16, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6188
MARCELINO RODRIGUEZ-LUNA,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
M. PETTIFORD, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(3:07-cv-03398-RBH)
Submitted: June 3, 2009 Decided: June 16, 2009
Before MICHAEL and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Marcelino Rodriguez-Luna, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier
Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Marcelino Rodriguez-Luna appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Rodriguez-Luna v. Pettiford, No. 3:07-cv-03398-RBH (D.S.C. Jan.
28, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.