The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6173•United States of America v. Travis Le-Ron Carrington
09-6173Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 5, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6173
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TRAVIS LE-RON CARRINGTON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:00-cr-00388-JRS-2)
Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: May 5, 2009
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Travis Le-Ron Carrington, Appellant Pro Se. Nicholas Stephan
Altimari, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Stephen Wiley
Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Travis Le-Ron Carrington appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for sentence reduction pursuant to
Amendment 706. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Carrington, No. 3:00-
cr-00388-JRS-2 (E.D. Va. Jan 15, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.