The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6148•Annis Recardo Lloyd v. Connie Jordan; Judge J. Hockenbury; Judge Lanier; Roddey Brown
09-6148Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 29, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6148
ANNIS RECARDO LLOYD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CONNIE JORDAN; JUDGE J. HOCKENBURY; JUDGE LANIER; RODDEY
BROWN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (5:08-ct-03143-H)
Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 29, 2009
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Annis Recardo Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Annis Recardo Lloyd appeals the district court’s order
dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action
alleging violation of his constitutional rights. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Lloyd v. Jordan, No. 5:08-ct-03143-H (E.D.N.C. Jan. 22, 2009).
We deny Lloyd’s motion for injunctive relief and
motion to compel. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.