The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6107•United States of America v. RICHARD EARL WILSON, JR., a/k/a Robert Wilson
09-6107Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 8, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6107
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RICHARD EARL WILSON, JR., a/k/a Robert Wilson,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
Judge. (2:95-cr-00049-RBS-10)
Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 8, 2009
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard Earl Wilson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael
Comstock, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Richard Wilson, Jr., appeals from the district court’s
orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and denying his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Wilson, No. 2:95-cr-
00049-RBS-10 (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 28, entered Oct. 30, 2008;
filed Dec. 1, entered Dec. 2, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.