The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6097•Billy G. Asemani v. LOIS I. FISHER, Chief Attorney
09-6097Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 29, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6097
BILLY G. ASEMANI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
LOIS I. FISHER, Chief Attorney; NANCY S. FORSTER, Chief
Public Defender; COLLATERAL REVIEW DIVISION OF THE OPD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:08-cv-03272-RDB)
Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 29, 2009
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Billy G. Asemani, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Billy G. Asemani appeals the district court’s order
dismissing a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action complaining that
Defendants will not authorize funds to pay for an expert witness
that Asemani deems essential to his state post-conviction case.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Asemani v. Fisher, No. 1:08-cv-03272-RDB (D. Md. filed
Dec. 15, 2008, entered Dec. 16, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.