The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6066•United States of America v. Lester Johnson, a/k/a Main
09-6066Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 20, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6066
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
LESTER JOHNSON, a/k/a Main,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (3:95-cr-00488-JFA)
Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 20, 2009
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lester Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, Assistant
United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lester Johnson appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) and denying his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See United States v. Johnson, No. 3:95-
cr-00488-JFA (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2009 & June 22, 2009). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.