The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6063•Clayton Williams v. STEVEN RYAN, Physical Therapist
09-6063Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 16, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6063
CLAYTON WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
STEVEN RYAN, Physical Therapist; DWAIN M. BREWER, Officer,
CO II; RODERICK R. SOWER, CCE Warden,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge.
(1:07-cv-03461-JFM)
Submitted: September 4, 2009 Decided: September 16, 2009
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clayton Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Rex Schultz Gordon, OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Clayton Williams appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendants’ summary judgment motion and dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights action. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v. Ryan,
No. 1:07-cv-03461-JFM (D. Md. Nov. 13, 2008). We also deny
Williams’ motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.