The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-6002•United States of America v. CLARENCE LEE BASSETT, JR., a/k/a Junie
09-6002Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 29, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6002
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CLARENCE LEE BASSETT, JR., a/k/a Junie,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior
District Judge. (4:03-cr-00069-RGD-TEM-1)
Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: June 29, 2009
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clarence Lee Bassett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Rae McKeel,
Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Clarence Bassett, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for a judicial inquiry and seeking an
evidentiary hearing on the Government’s refusal to file a Fed.
R. Crim. P. 35 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Bassett, No.
4:03-cr-00069-RGD-TEM-1 (E.D. Va. Dec. 5, 2008). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.