The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-2395•Walter D. Hayes v. W. WARE MORRISON, Attorney & Counselor at Law
09-2395Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 26, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2395
WALTER D. HAYES,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
W. WARE MORRISON, Attorney & Counselor at Law; PROVIDENT
LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY; EDWARD E. ROLLINS, JR.;
GLADYS HAYES-OWENS; CHARLES EVERETT MALONE, Attorney at Law,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (2:09-cv-00431-JBF-FBS)
Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: April 26, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Walter D. Hayes, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Walter D. Hayes appeals the district court’s order
denying reconsideration of the dismissal for lack of
jurisdiction of Hayes’ civil complaint. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny
Hayes’ motion to overturn the district court’s decision and
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hayes v.
Morrison, No. 2:09-cv-00431-JBF-FBS (E.D. Va. Nov. 24, 2009).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.