The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-2376•Nathan Sturdivant v. JOHN MCHUGH, Honorable, Department of the Army; SECRETARY OF THE ARMY
09-2376Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 16, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2376
NATHAN STURDIVANT,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JOHN MCHUGH, Honorable, Department of the Army; SECRETARY OF
THE ARMY,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:09-cv-00586-LO-JFA)
Submitted: July 26, 2010 Decided: August 16, 2010
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathan Sturdivant, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr.,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Nathan Sturdivant appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to Defendant in this action brought
under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Sturdivant v. McHugh, No. 1:09-cv-00586-LO-JFA (E.D.
Va., filed Nov. 19, 2009 & entered Nov. 20, 2009). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.