Charlene E. Tyler v. Palmetto Gba

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2341
CHARLENE E. TYLER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
PALMETTO GBA,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (3:09-cv-01119-CMC)
Submitted: May 24, 2010 Decided: June 15, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William T. Toal, JOHNSON, TOAL & BATTISTE, P.A., Columbia, South
Carolina, for Appellant. Kathryn Thomas, Fred A. Williams,
GIGNILLIAT, SAVITZ & BETTIS, L.L.P., Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Charlene E. Tyler appeals the district court’s
judgment in Palmetto GBA’s favor on Tyler’s claim for severance
pay, brought pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 1001 to 1461 (West 2008 & Supp.
2009). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
See Tyler v. Palmetto GBA, No. 3:09-cv-01119-CMC (D.S.C. filed
Nov. 2, 2009, entered Nov. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --