The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-2336•Lourdes Iglesias v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.p.
09-2336Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 26, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2336
LOURDES IGLESIAS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P.,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:09-cv-00008-MSD-FBS)
Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: April 26, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lourdes Iglesias, Appellant Pro Se. Lindsey Hager McGinnis,
LITTLER MENDELSON, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Lourdes Iglesias appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss her claims against it.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Iglesias
v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., No. 2:09-cv-00008-MSD-FBS (E.D.
Va. Oct. 26, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.