Independence Federal Savings Bank v. Jay Bonanza Briley; Constance H. Briley

09-2314Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 26, 2010

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2314
INDEPENDENCE FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
JAY BONANZA BRILEY; CONSTANCE H. BRILEY,
Defendants – Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:08-cv-01189-LO-JFA)
Submitted: August 19, 2010 Decided: August 26, 2010
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jay Bonanza Briley; Constance H. Briley, Appellants Pro Se.
Stephen Warren Nichols, COOTER, MANGOLD, TOMPERT & KARAS, LLP,
Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Jay and Constance Briley appeal the district court's
order granting Independence Federal Savings Bank’s summary
judgment motion on its breach of contract claim. The Brileys
have also filed several motions in this court, including motions
for appointment of counsel, for dismissal of judgment, and for
the Bank to provide documentation of tax relief it allegedly
received. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny the pending motions and affirm the
district court’s order and judgment. Independence Fed. Sav.
Bank v. Briley, No. 1:08-cv-01189-LO-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Oct.
27, 2009 & entered Oct. 29, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.