The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-2288•Kareemah Bell-Boston v. GLENETTE M. HILTON, Assistant Chief of Police for Administration, University of the…
09-2288Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 20, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2288
KAREEMAH BELL-BOSTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GLENETTE M. HILTON, Assistant Chief of Police for
Administration, University of the District of Columbia,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:09-cv-01227-LMB-IDD)
Submitted: January 14, 2010 Decided: January 20, 2010
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kareemah Bell-Boston, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kareemah Bell-Boston appeals the district court’s
order dismissing her complaint for lack of subject matter
jurisdiction and improper venue. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Bell-Boston v. Hilton,
No. 1:09-cv-01227-LMB-IDD (E.D. Va. Oct. 30, 2009). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.