The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-2270•Jacqueline Woods v. CASSANDRA SMITH, Security Personnel; MICHAEL ADU; WILLIAM WASHINGTON, District Manager
09-2270Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 19, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2270
JACQUELINE WOODS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CASSANDRA SMITH, Security Personnel; MICHAEL ADU; WILLIAM
WASHINGTON, District Manager,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
JA-KIA ANTHONY, Human Resources,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:09-cv-00527-JCC-IDD)
Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 19, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jacqueline Woods, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Ramapuram,
BONNER, KIERNAN, TREBACH & CROCIATA, LLP, Washington, D.C., for
Appellees.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Jacqueline Woods appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her action with prejudice for failure to state a
claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Woods v. Smith, No. 1:09-cv-00527-JCC-IDD (E.D.
Va. Oct. 6, 2009). Additionally, we deny Woods’s motion to
strike and motion to compel. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.