The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-2241•Kevin C. Umphreyville v. Charles W. Gittins
09-2241Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 22, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2241
KEVIN C. UMPHREYVILLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHARLES W. GITTINS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, District
Judge. (5:07-cv-00096-gec-bwc)
Submitted: February 10, 2010 Decided: February 22, 2010
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin C. Umphreyville, Appellant Pro Se. William Leonard
Mitchell, II, ECCLESTON & WOLF, PC, Washington, D.C., for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kevin C. Umphreyville appeals a district court order
granting summary judgment to Charles W. Gittins and dismissing
his complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
court’s memorandum opinion and affirm for the reasons cited by
the district court. See Umphreyville v. Gittins, No. 5:07-cv-
00096-gec-bwc (W.D. Va. Sept. 29, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.