The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-2229•William C. Pringle, Sr.; Lisa Pringle v. Emc Mortgage Corporation
09-2229Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 20, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2229
WILLIAM C. PRINGLE, SR.; LISA PRINGLE,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
EMC MORTGAGE CORPORATION; WELLS FARGO BANK NA; BOB CAPES
REALTORS; FANNIE MAE; FREDDIE MAC,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (3:08-cv-04146-JFA)
Submitted: January 14, 2010 Decided: January 20, 2010
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William C. Pringle, Sr., Lisa Pringle, Appellants Pro Se.
Matthew Douglas Patterson, NELSON, MULLINS, RILEY & SCARBOROUGH,
LLP, Columbia, South Carolina; Catharine Garbee Griffin, BAKER,
RAVENEL & BENDER, LLP, Columbia, South Carolina; Robert Preston
Wood, ROGERS, TOWNSEND & THOMAS, PC, Columbia, South Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
William C. Pringle, Sr., and Lisa Pringle appeal the
district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and granting Defendants’ motions to dismiss,
denying Plaintiffs’ motion for entry of default judgment, and
dismissing as moot Plaintiffs’ motion for an injunction and
Defendant Bob Cape Realtors’ motion to sever. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Pringle v. EMC
Mortgage Corp., No. 3:08-cv-04146-JFA (D.S.C. Sept. 11, 2009).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.