The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-2207•Shirley A. Johnson v. Midlands Technical College
09-2207Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 26, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2207
SHIRLEY A. JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MIDLANDS TECHNICAL COLLEGE; RONALD RHAMES, in their
individual capacity; TIMOTHY MCLELLAN, in their individual
capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (3:08-cv-00803-JFA)
Submitted: April 22, 2010 Decided: April 26, 2010
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shirley A. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Lake E. Summers, Charles
Franklin Thompson, Jr., MALONE, THOMPSON, SUMMERS & OTT,
Columbia, South Carolina; Henry Knight, Jr., CONSTANGY, BROOKS &
SMITH, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Shirley A. Johnson appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
her employment discrimination and retaliation action. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Johnson
v. Midlands Technical Coll., No. 3:08-cv-00803-JFA (D.S.C. Sept.
21, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.