The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-2132•Warren R. Follum v. North Carolina State University
09-2132Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 19, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2132
WARREN R. FOLLUM,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY; KEVIN MACNAUGHTON, in his
individual and official capacities; MICHAEL HARWOOD, in his
individual and official capacities; CAROLE ACQUESTA, in her
individual and official capacities; BARBARA CARROLL, in her
individual and official capacities,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan,
Chief District Judge. (5:08-cv-00526-FL)
Submitted: March 16, 2010 Decided: March 19, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Warren R. Follum, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly D. Potter,
Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Warren R. Follum appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing his employment discrimination complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Follum v. North Carolina State Univ., No. 5:08-cv-00526-FL
(E.D.N.C. Sept 2, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.