The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-2124•Deborah Reynolds v. SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INCORPORATED, a corporation; JAMES H. SLAYTON
09-2124Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 28, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2124
DEBORAH REYNOLDS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INCORPORATED, a corporation;
JAMES H. SLAYTON,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers,
District Judge. (3:07-cv-00457)
Submitted: May 14, 2010 Decided: May 28, 2010
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Deborah Reynolds, Appellant Pro Se. Mary H. Sanders, HUDDLESTON
& BOLEN, LLP, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Deborah Reynolds appeals the district court’s order
entering judgment for Defendants in accordance with the jury’s
verdict in Reynolds’ negligence action. We have reviewed the
record and the issues Reynolds raises on appeal and find no
grounds for appellate relief. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. Reynolds v. Swift Transp. Co., Inc.,
No. 3:07-cv-00457 (S.D. W. Va. Sept. 2, 2009). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.