The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-2122•Howard B. Odom v. International Paper Company
09-2122Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 3, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2122
HOWARD B. ODOM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:08-cv-00480-MSD-JEB)
Submitted: May 17, 2010 Decided: June 3, 2010
Before MOTZ, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Carolyn P. Carpenter, LAW OFFICES OF CAROLYN P. CARPENTER, PLLC,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Vincent Miraglia,
INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY, Memphis, Tennessee; Lynn F. Jacob,
WILLIAMS MULLEN, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Howard B. Odom appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to Defendant International Paper
Company on Odom’s action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act
of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (2006). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Odom v. Int’l Paper
Co., No. 2:08-cv-00480-MSD-JEB (E.D. Va. Sept. 1, 2009). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.