The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-2116•Darrin L. King v. Smithfield Food
09-2116Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 20, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2116
DARRIN L. KING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SMITHFIELD FOOD,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (2:08-cv-00487-JBF-FBS)
Submitted: November 17, 2009 Decided: November 20, 2009
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Darrin L. King, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Westcott Smith,
KAUFMAN & CANOLES, PC, Williamsburg, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Darrin King appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment for the Appellee on King’s claim of
disability discrimination. On appeal, we confine our review to
the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. Rule
34(b). King’s brief fails to challenge the district court’s
dispositive conclusions that he failed to demonstrate a prima
facie case of discrimination and that the Appellee had
legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for not hiring King.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order and deny
King’s motions to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid in the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.