The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-2108•Angus A. Whitney, a/k/a A1 A. Whitney v. UNITED STATES NAVY, Department of the Navy, Commander Navy Region, Mid-Atlantic
09-2108Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 23, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2108
ANGUS A. WHITNEY, a/k/a A1 A. Whitney,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES NAVY, Department of the Navy, Commander Navy
Region, Mid-Atlantic; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:09-cv-00201-RAJ-TEM)
Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 23, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Angus A. Whitney, Appellant Pro Se. Kent Pendleton Porter,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Angus Whitney appeals the district court’s order
granting the Government’s motion to dismiss for lack of
jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by
the district court. Whitney v. United States Navy, No. 2:09-cv-
00201-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. July 28, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.