The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-2065•Cosandra R. Carr v. Prince George’s County, Maryland
09-2065Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 30, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2065
COSANDRA R. CARR,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY, MARYLAND,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:07-
cv-02554-RWT)
Submitted: August 18, 2010 Decided: August 30, 2010
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cosandra R. Carr, Appellant Pro Se. Tonia Yvetta Belton-
Gofreed, Associate County Attorney, Upper Marlboro, Maryland,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Cosandra R. Carr appeals the district court’s order
granting Prince George’s County, Maryland’s summary judgment
motion on her employment discrimination claims, brought pursuant
to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,
42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2006). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order. See Carr v. Prince George’s Cnty., MD,
No. 8:07-cv-02554-RWT (D. Md. Aug. 17, 2009). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.