The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-2059•Toni Clark v. National Credit Union Administration
09-2059Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 1, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-2059
TONI CLARK,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior
District Judge. (1:09-cv-00779-TSE-JFA)
Submitted: November 19, 2009 Decided: December 1, 2009
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Toni Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Bernard G. Kim, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Toni Clark appeals the district court’s order denying
her motion to remand to state court and dismissing her civil
complaint against the National Credit Union Administration for
lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Clark v. Nat’l Credit
Union Admin., No. 1:09-cv-00779-TSE-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 28,
2009 & entered Sept. 1, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.