Yanne Venieris v. Family Living Institute

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1955
YANNE VENIERIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FAMILY LIVING INSTITUTE,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 09-1963
YANNE VENIERIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ROBERT WITTMAN,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 09-1964
YANNE VENIERIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY,
Defendant - Appellee.

-- 1 of 4 --

No. 09-1965
YANNE VENIERIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RIVERSIDE BEHAVIORAL,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 09-1967
YANNE VENIERIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 09-1979
YANNE VENIERIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BARACK OBAMA, President,
Defendant - Appellee.
2

-- 2 of 4 --

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith,
District Judge. (4:09-cv-00103-RBS-TEM; 4:09-cv-00101-RBS-TEM;
4:09-cv-00095-RBS-TEM; 4:09-cv-00102-RBS-TEM; 4:09-cv-00100-RBS-
TEM; 4:09-cv-00098-RBS-TEM)
Submitted: November 19, 2009 Decided: December 1, 2009
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Yanne Venieris, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

-- 3 of 4 --

4
PER CURIAM:
Yanne Venieris appeals the district court's orders
dismissing his six civil suits as frivolous pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) (2006). We have reviewed the records
in these cases and find that Venieris’ appeals are frivolous.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for the reasons stated by
the district court. Venieris v. Family Living Inst., No. 4:09-
cv-00103-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va. Aug. 14, 2009); Venieris v. Wittman,
No. 4:09-cv-00101-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va. Aug. 17, 2009); Venieris v.
Drug Enforcement Agency, No. 4:09-cv-00095-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va.
Aug. 17, 2009); Venieris v. Riverside Behavioral, No. 4:09-cv-
00102-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 14, 2009 & entered Aug. 17,
2009); Venieris v. Obama, No. 4:09-cv-00100-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va.
August 17, 2009); Venieris v. Obama, No. 4:09-cv-00098-RBS-TEM
(E.D. Va. August 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 4 of 4 --