The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-1950•Donna Sabol v. Healthextras, Incorporated
09-1950Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 1, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1950
DONNA SABOL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HEALTHEXTRAS, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:08-cv-00198-F)
Submitted: September 9, 2010 Decided: October 1, 2010
Before KING, SHEDD, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Aaron C. Hemmings, HEMMINGS & STEVENS, PLLC, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellant. Christopher J. Blake, Leslie Lane
Mize, NELSON, MULLINS, RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Donna Sabol appeals the district court’s order in her
civil action granting HealthExtras, Incorporation’s motion to
dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Sabol v.
HealthExtras, Inc., No. 5:08-cv-00198-E (E.D.N.C. July 17,
2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.