The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-1944•Earl L. Thorton, Jr. v. DONNIE HARRISON, Wake County Sheriff, officially
09-1944Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 23, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1944
EARL L. THORTON, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DONNIE HARRISON, Wake County Sheriff, officially; FRANK
GUNTER, Jail Administrator, officially and individually;
JOHN DOE #1, officially and individually; JOHN DOE #2,
officially and individually,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:08-cv-00043-F)
Submitted: February 18, 2010 Decided: February 23, 2010
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Earl L. Thorton, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Albert Maxfield,
COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE FOR THE COUNTY OF WAKE, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Earl L. Thornton, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Thorton v. Harrison, No. 5:08-cv-00043-F (E.D.N.C.
July 31, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.