The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-1879•Arlin Edward Raney v. Secretary of Commerce; United States Patent & Trademark Office
09-1879Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 2, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1879
ARLIN EDWARD RANEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SECRETARY OF COMMERCE; UNITED STATES PATENT & TRADEMARK
OFFICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior
District Judge. (1:09-cv-00352-TSE-TRJ)
Submitted: February 25, 2010 Decided: March 2, 2010
Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arlin Edward Raney, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan,
Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Arlin Edward Raney appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Raney v. Secretary of
Commerce, No. 1:09-cv-00352-TSE-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed June 30,
2009; entered July 1, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.