The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-1876•Paul White Wilson v. Pnc Bank, N.a.; Ronald D. Foxworth
09-1876Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 4, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1876
PAUL WHITE WILSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PNC BANK, N.A.; RONALD D. FOXWORTH,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 09-2279
PAUL WHITE WILSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PNC BANK, N.A.; RONALD D. FOXWORTH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (5:08-cv-00388-H)
Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 4, 2010
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul White Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Frank Marshall Wall,
CRANFILL, SUMNER & HARTZOG, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Robert
Cowan deRosset, IV, YOUNG, MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Paul White Wilson appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his civil action and his motion to supplement the
record. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Wilson v. PNC Bank, No. 5:08-cv-00388-H
(E.D.N.C. July 15, 2009 & Oct. 14, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.