The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-1875•Renee R. Berry v. GARY LOCKE, Secretary, Department of Commerce
09-1875Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 17, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1875
RENEE R. BERRY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
GARY LOCKE, Secretary, Department of Commerce,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
CARLOS M. GUTIERREZ, Secretary, Department of Commerce,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:08-cv-00697-JCC-TRJ)
Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 17, 2009
Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Renee R. Berry, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Bonner McClendon,
Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for
Appellee.
-- 1 of 3 --
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Renee R. Berry appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice Berry’s civil complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the
appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Berry v.
Locke, No. 1:08-cv-00697-JCC-TRJ (E.D. Va. June 5, 2009). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.